The terror of the male Time for a Lively debate

Every so often something comes along that plugs like a mains cable into the heart of our thinking. That articulates what we have been groping to articulate for years. That explains not just the problem it addresses, but much else besides. Professor Harper on why the Roman Empire fell, or Amy Chua on the intractable nature of tribal hatreds were two such, as our readers recall. Now we think Sophie Lively of the University of Newcastle may have done the same for the neuralgic topic of Masculine Identity.[1] Far from being some idle construct of the Sociology schools, we think that masculinity and the toxic psychological flows around it are at the heart of the problems which this blog has been discussing for years, with such remarkable lack of success. Things like climate change, inequality, hostility to learning(and thereby scientific research) hyper-consumption and even health and traffic management (that’s enough problems-ed)

Let’s start with Sophie . She has been avidly researching social conditions in the city of Newcastle in North east England. Formerly a region of heavy industry it is undergoing profound economic change. English people will recognise the stereotype of its characteristic inhabitant:- a hard-working no-nonsense Geordie who loves his beer and football and has no time for fancy intellectuals. He can be glimpsed in TV shows like Whatever Happened to the Likely Lads?, as Biffa Bacon in the Viz comic strip or in songs like Lindisfarne’s Meet me on the Corner. He is proud, he is brave, he is tough he can be kindly and amusing. And like working men across the world, he is in deep, deep crisis As Sophie explains

Traditional” views of masculinity were particularly prevalent during the height of industry in the area. These views centred around ideas of men as providers and ideas of toughness. Value was placed on a willingness (or need) to do physical and often hazardous labour.

And now that’s needed less and less. Are we surprised they find themselves bewildered, alienated, anxious? In need of quick easy assurances that everything about them is still alright. How would you feel, gentle reader, if you were told that University graduates are not needed any more?

And so we come to the light this sheds on the big problems this blog poses but has never satisfactorily answered. Why have progressive parties so utterly and completely lost the support of working men? Why do so many poor people vote for people whose aim is to make the rich richer and the poor work harder? Why are so many young men drawn to the cults of rap music, football hooliganism and religious terrorism? Why all the cults of nostalgia around Spitfires, country houses and the urge to go back down horrid coal mines? (LSS 8 12 22) Why do men in lorries feel impelled to chop down trees, flowerbeds and every other measure designed to curb pollution? Why do simple lies trump complex truths? In the next few weeks we will be running a series of blogs designed to look at these issues We hope all of you, whatever your age, class, sex and preferred form of relaxation will enjoy it and feed back in what we hope will be a lively debate. Thanks to Sophie for at last getting us started.

[1]https://theconversation.com/class-and-masculinity-are-connected-when-industry-changes-so-does-what-it-means-to-be-a-man-258857?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=

#climate change #sociology #feminism #masculinity #populism

Some riffs on masculinity, and how it plays out in elections

There’s no point progressives wringing our hands. We lost, forever. The best use of our time now is to try to work out some of the reasons why, so that future generations may not repeat our mistakes. It’s worth considering a range of explanations: economic, technological. psychological. For the first, economic, you won’t do much better than this one by Nesrine Malik of The Guardian, to which we just had to give a nod [1] But at the same time we couldn’t help thinking that everyone is affected by the economy(that’s how it got its name) So why the split between men and women? Have a look at this:

The president-elect represents a particular type of masculinity: he is seen as brash and straight-talking, and can appear domineering or patronising around women………………. For some women who voted for him, this might be a familiar personality that they’ve seen in their fathers and husbands. For men, Trump represents “hegemonic masculinity”, the exalted position of men at the top. In this view, aggression, control and dominance are all admirable traits and highly socially valued.

It’s from an article by Ashley Morgan in The Conversation,[2] and it made us ponder. The way that masculinities are formed, particularly in certain social classes. How smoking was advertised, and why it took so long to die out. Why speed cameras and signs near our home are often vandalised-and elsewhere [3] Why some people idolise gangsters. Why football hooligans exist. But before we begin, let’s ask a deeper question: why?

For thousands of years societies have prized strength and courage You needed it if you were a herdsman trying to push your flock over a pass in the Zagros mountains. While simultaneously fighting off the next tribe of robbers who sought to despoil you of the lot. Later industrial societies had many roles for such masculinity, in agriculture, industry or war. Never forget Dr Johnson‘s famous dictum “Sir- among the lower orders, what is often called insolence in times of peace is called courage in time of war.” For far too long, people who call themselves “progressive” have been too ready to despise and condemn men of-how to put this delicately?- certain classes and occupations.9that’ll do for now-ed) Last week they just came round to take their revenge. Serve us all jolly well right.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/nov/18/donald-trump-victory-liberals-modern-crisis-neoliberal

[2] https://theconversation.com/trump-represents-a-specific-type-of-masculinity-and-its-dangerous-for-women-243285?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Con

[3]https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/nov/18/wales-20mph-speed-limit-lives-money-policy

#masculinity #class #socialisation #trump #harris #neolithic #transhumance