Friday Night: Canadian Cocktails

“Canada : it’s a country where scale, sanity, and scenery all conspire in the traveller’s favour. You get cities that hum without overwhelming you — Vancouver’s ocean‑and‑mountain glamour, Montréal’s café‑soaked charm, Toronto’s multicultural thrum — and then, ten minutes later, you’re in a forest so vast it feels like a thought experiment. Lakes the size of small nations, wildlife that treats humans as mildly interesting background noise, and a national temperament that is unfailingly polite without being saccharine. For the holidaymaker, it’s the rare place where you can have adventure without chaos, wilderness without hardship, and culture without crowds.”

All of the preceding has been recently confirmed by first hand reports which have just reached us.  In fact, the two travellers concerned (plus wives) so very much enjoyed the place that we thought we’d salute their achievements by penning a hymn of praise to Canadian cocktails. And to save time we are going to link you directly to some brilliant experts called My Bartender [1] who have compiled  a list of no less than eight (count ‘em- eight!) delicious recipes, including how to make them, how to serve them, and above all how to enjoy them, whether you are touring the Maple Leaf Land itself, or sitting somewhere altogether more cramped like these sweaty offices in Croydon.   Read their outpourings now to learn more about the eponymous Canadian Cocktail, the Maple Leaf  (how Canadian is that?),the Canadian Maple Leaf old fashioned(answer: even more so) The White Canadian (must be good up on the snows of Baffin Island) The French Canadian (we say “oui” to that), JP Wisers Apple Jam’n (sounds as if it could soothe the  savagest sasquatch) The Strawberry Sour(ditto a bear) and finally the Canadian Caesar( not to be confused with the American Caesar-he is become so tiresome lately)

And we hope that by sipping just one of the above you you will get some taste of this glorious country which our correspondents enjoyed so very much

By the way:  do not really  attempt to soothe actual bears with cocktails. They have their own views on mixology and tend to become prickly and stand offish at even small frustrations

Thanks to P Seymour and G Herbert

[1] 8 Best Canadian Cocktails to Drink

#cocktails #canada #travel #rocky mountains #holidays

Round up :  Bird Flu hits Australia. Ancient comet, Free hydrogen, Who gets the last laugh?

Bird flu has reached every continent reports Nature Briefing. Maybe H5N1 may never cause a human pandemic — but avian influenza viruses will keep trying, so tracking H5N1 ‘s  march to Australia matters. Because when the Big One hits, we will need every bit of data we can get

The H5N1 strain of avian influenza has been detected in two wild birds in Australia — the first cases of the disease on the continent. There’s no evidence that the virus has killed large groups of birds or mammals, but at least 58 sick or dead birds have been reported on an emergency hotline. Mainland Australia had previously been a stronghold against the virus, but “we all knew we couldn’t be bird flu-free forever”, says Julie Collins, the country’s agricultural minister. BBC | 4 min read & ABC News | 6 min read

Older than the stars? The detection of interstellar comets, true visitors to our solar system from far away, has been one of the recent achievements of Astronomy. The Guardian has this story about the latest, from the true depths of time:

Interstellar comet may be oldest object seen in our solar system, scientists say | Comets | The Guardian

There’s hydrogen in them there hills Imagine what a clean natural source of hydrogen could do for sustainable lifestyles. It may be lurking out there in the tectonic folds of the Alps reports the Guardian

Could mountains be key to unlocking hydrogen’s potential? | Science | The Guardian

Apes are good for a laugh It seems humans have two types of laugh, neurologically speaking One shared with out great ape relatives, and one more particularly our own  according to El País. As Nature Briefing has more on the fascinating theme of primate humour, we decided to throw in their take on it as well.

Una risa ancestral y otra puramente humana nacen en distintas regiones del cerebro | Ciencia | EL PAÍS

Humans and apes share a laugh

Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and children laugh in similar rhythms when tickled. Researchers found that kids and apes left evenly spaced intervals between laughing sounds during a tickle attack, though children had a faster laughter rhythm compared with apes. Laughter might have picked up pace during the course of human evolution, the team suggests, which could reveal “something about laughter itself, but also, in a way, about the evolution of human speech”, says primatologist and study co-author Chiara De Gregorio. Nature | 4 min read
Reference: Communications Biology paper
  Quote of the week He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that.    John Stuart Mill On Liberty

# H5N1 #avian influenza  #interstellar comets#astronomy  #primatology #evolution #sustainable energy #hydrogen

Rechargeable liquid battery-one of the best news stories for a long time

One of the great pleasures of writing this blog is the opportunity to riff on really good news stories. Especially when they come from trustworthy and erudite sources like Nature Briefing. Even more when they fit so clearly with our own ideas on how humanity might survive this interminable polycrisis.  Let’s begin with the story,  New Liquid acts like  rechargeable battery which they are basing on Science and Chem (their links below)

A new type of liquid can harvest and store energy from light to act as a rechargeable power source. The liquid contains a molecule that absorbs electrons from light, which prompts a restructure into a jelly-like substance. This gel remains stable for months at a time and can release the stored electrons upon contact with oxygen to power chemical reactions. The research is still in very early stages, but such a metal-free energy storage system could one day be useful to power small devices such as smartwatches. Science | 4 min read
Reference: Chem paper

And our thoughts? They are both particular and general, gentle readers. In particular; it’s early days yet but if it works, we are looking at a metal free battery replacement. Think of how much dirty, energy intensive mining that could save. No more batteries to throw away. Even the complex panels and wires of modern panels suddenly look a tad passé, don’t they? Putting the new technology firmly on the same road as other new imaginative third-generation systems such as organic solar cells and self-charging polymers. The portfolio of ever more imaginative and ever more ecologically sound generation systems just grows and grows. Which leads us to our general points. Firstly: to preserve such archaic technologies as oil and gas is as mistaken as wanting to go back to typewriters in offices or using huge stone circles such as the one at Stonehenge to tell the time. Any nation that chooses fossil fuels will soon be at a hopeless technological disadvantage.  But secondly: get this from the Science article, because we think it’s a killer point about everything we do here

The new material draws inspiration from the behaviour of the cytoskeleton, the constantly self-assembling and disassembling network of protein filaments within a cell that enables it to move and divide.

Yes, you guessed it, That same oft-repeated truism we’re always trotting out “basic research in one area will produce unexpected dividends elsewhere”  has been proved again. That’s something  our readers all around the world will agree with.

 #energy #technology #sustainability #solar power #batteries carbon emissions #renewables

Brexit: how two Rights made a wrong

Brexit could have worked. Read those words slowly, from an honest Remainer. Because as some of us always knew, there were pragmatic arguments from the other side, which we feared greatly, because they were exceedingly strong. So how is that most successful political project in recent British History now seems to have fallen so flat? Why, ten years on, do the memories of Brexit feel far from triumphant?  We repeat, so that no one gets us wrong: Brexit could have worked. And this is why we think it didn’t.

The overarching problem was that the Leave coalition was built from two groups who wanted entirely different futures.  Both were impeccably Right Wing. Both were possessed a vision of a  future that could well have worked.  But both pressed the same “Brexit “ button for opposite reasons. Because they belonged to two quite different right-wing tribes.  One tribe, The Free‑marketeers dreamed of a Britain unshackled from Brussels, a nimble “Singapore‑on‑Thames”: low taxes, light regulation, capital flowing freely, goods moving frictionlessly, and a labour market kept competitive by high mobility. Their model required openness — to investment, to trade, and, crucially, to people. What can be more red tape than Immigration controls? But it might have been very, very prosperous.

The other half of the coalition wanted the exact reverse. The Nationalists imagined their Brexit as a chance to pull up the drawbridge: to instigate tighter immigration rules, more insulation from global competition, to achieve a more interventionist state protecting industries and communities. Some were driven by economic insecurity, some by cultural anxiety, and yes — some by outright hostility to outsiders, seeing Brexit as a way to begin a purge of “foreigners” from public life. Their model required barriers, buffers, and a powerful State willing to police identity as much as borders. It was a vision of national retreat, not global acceleration. But it might have been very, very stable.

These two projects could not coexist beyond Brexit day. You cannot believe in the free movement of capital and goods while fleeing, like a child at bathtime, from the free movement of labour. Markets do not work that way. Block labour and capital simply moves instead; block people and goods compensate; block both and you get the stagnation we now inhabit. Brexit tried to fuse two rights — the right to globalise and the right to barricade — and produced a wrong. A decade later, the contradiction still sits at the heart of British politics, unresolved and unresolvable, because the country cannot be both fortress and freeport at the same time. Deep, deep down, the question is not about Europe, nor taxes nor even immigration rules: all are details  It is What do you want to be going forwards?

‘I feel entirely vindicated’: three Guardian columnists debate Brexit and its legacy | Aditya Chakrabortty, Polly Toynbee and Simon Jenkins | The GuardianThe Economic Impact of Brexit | NBER

#brexit #united kingdom #european union #economics #history #nationalism #free markets

Should we blame Alan Greenspan for everything that’s gone wrong?

As historians of the future pick through the rubble of America’s decline and fall after its supreme triumph in 1991, they will ask one plaintive question: “How was such a winning position thrown away so decisively — and so quickly?” There will be plenty of blame to go around, plenty of suspects against whom fingers will be pointed. But one name keeps coming up again and again: Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve of the United States from 1987 to 2006.

Today, the case for the prosecution against “ol’ Al” is made loudly, cogently, and with devastating clarity by Robert Reich, US Secretary of Labor under Clinton and now a professor at Berkeley.

We really think you should read this [1] — especially if you have a home, a family, a community, and, most pertinently of all, a job where the salary has not risen significantly in twenty years or so. But for those pressed for time, Reich summarises what he sees as Greenspan’s masterpiece of misjudgement thus:

“If any single person was responsible for the financial crisis of 2008, it was Greenspan… the worst collapse since 1929… resulted from the deregulation of Wall Street that Greenspan advocated.”

He pushed Clinton and Congress to repeal the Glass–Steagall Act, which since the 1930s had separated investment banking from commercial banking, thereby preventing banks from gambling with personal savings. He also argued vigorously against regulating derivatives — essentially financial bets on financial bets — that later proved to be weapons of mass financial destruction.”

Yet we ask: is the culprit really Greenspan? Or is it actually ourselves?

Greenspan was widely regarded by critics as an enthusiastic advocate of the ultra‑rich and the values they espouse: hierarchy, conspicuous consumption, obsessive individualism. Whether these are virtues or vices is a matter of debate — but they were adopted enthusiastically by wide sections of the population for decades, making the task of Greenspan and his Wall Street fellow‑travellers infinitely easier.

For the ultimate illusion they peddled was Common Sense: it makes sense to reduce the deficit, for what is a nation but a giant household? Well, it is a bit — but mostly it isn’t. So things like infrastructure, research, and health go into the “nice‑but‑we‑can’t‑afford‑it” ledger too many times, and slowly but surely decline acquires a momentous, unstoppable hegemony of its own.

So don’t just blame Greenspan — blame ourselves for buying into a system that puts that sort of man into that sort of job. And hope that future societies develop much more judicious HR policies.

[1] RIP Alan Greenspan: you were charming, powerful and wrong | Robert Reich | The Guardian

#business #economics #united states of America #alan greenspan #robert reich #finance #markets

Vaccines: it’s a question of Anthropology not Biology: Gillian Tett knows why

 Why doesn’t evidence cut through? Why do reason and learning so often fail? They’re themes that have haunted this blog since its inception way back in the COVID‑19 days of 2020. Aren’t we supposed to be the heirs of the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, and all that? Maybe part of the answer lies in this story about the UK and Japan, and their startlingly different experiences with their respective HPV vaccination programmes, as detailed in this excellent Conversation article by Professor Justin Stebbing of Anglia Ruskin University [1].

On the face of it, vaccines are a winner: the biology is clearly understood, they save lives, and they have eliminated numerous diseases [2]. Which explains the success of the UK rollout of the HPV vaccine: Justin has a barrage of juicy statistics, but in his words the NHS now feels able to publish a plan to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem in England by 2040. Compare that with Japan, where following a reasonable start, the HPV vaccine campaign collapsed into desuetude. There were media stories, the government lost its nerve: the result is” that among girls born in certain years, coverage fell from around 70% to below 1%, and it remained at that level for years“. And Justin explains the dreary consequences at some length.

So why can’t we understand the difference between the two countries? In the end, vaccine hesitancy has very little to do with the science and everything to do with the stories people swim in. The biology stays constant; what shifts is the cultural weather around it. A rumour here, a misframed headline there, a neighbour’s anecdote, a politician’s stumble — tiny changes in narrative that can tilt whole communities from confidence to doubt. Vaccination succeeds or fails not in the laboratory but in the social world: in trust networks, identity cues, and the fragile ways humans decide whom to believe. It is anthropology, not virology, that explains why one hospital bed stays empty and another does not.

In other words, public health is really about anthropology, not biology. One person who understands this well is Gillian Tett, whose formidable book Anthro‑Vision [3] argues that the real drivers of human behaviour are rarely the numbers on the page but the cultural currents beneath them — the stories people trust, the tribes they belong to, the risks they feel rather than calculate. Public health often talks in data, but people decide in narrative. A stray rumour, a clumsy headline, a shift in group mood can undo months of scientific clarity, while a well‑placed story or trusted voice can restore confidence just as fast. And suddenly this becomes true of many of the things that preoccupy us here — climate change, economics, even the long arc of female emancipation. For all our “LSS are the  heirs‑of‑the‑Age‑of‑Reason,” for all our Whiggish rhetoric, we’ve missed one important truth. People are not how we would like them to be. And this book tells us a lot about why.

[1]https://theconversation.com/the-hpv-vaccine-works-but-only-if-we-keep-trusting-it-285618?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20fo

[2] Why vaccination is important and the safest way to protect yourself – NHS

[3]Tett, Gillian. Anthro‑Vision: How Anthropology Can Explain Business and Life. London: Random House Business, 2021.

#vaccination #public health  # HPV   #anthropology #biology #culture #history

Friday Night: Côtes de Provence Rosé for summer evenings

We know of no happier place to visit than the sun-drenched French region of Provence. To descend on final approach into Nice is gain privileged witness to all of its charms  in a single five minute panorama as the plane crosses lavender covered  mountains, vineyards, opulent settlements like Antibes and Juan‑les‑Pins, busy crowded beaches and les aménagements of every conceivable period of history. For Provence (originally Provincia Romana, the Republics’ first holding outside of Italy) has been at the crossroads of human development for hundreds of thousands of years. The Romans found a thriving Greek colony that was already big on wines, olives and all the other appurtenances of Classical Civilisation. Many asseverate that the traditions of that Civilisation were never entirely lost here while the rest of Europe collapsed into the Dark Ages. And under the Counts of Provence a thriving new culture, a medieval “cool” of artists and poets re emerged into the sunlight of a growing prosperity which has somehow survived invasions, religious wars, papal exiles, revolutions, world wars and even competition from fast food empires.

But fans of this column will want to know “What do they drink, and where can we get some?” Old Provençal hands will recognise names like Bandol , Cassis (the appellation, not the liqueur) and pastis almost from their subconscious. And every good bar will run a line in beers like Kronenbourg 1664 for hot days in hilltop villages. But today we are going to go with one of our all-time favourites : Côtes de Provence Rosé: the big, sunlit workhorse of the region: pale, saline, herbal, carrying the taste of every fine holiday spent, and memory generated, in this glorious region. As usual we shall offer three types, thus suiting every pocket. And although based on the  English market, which is sadly all we know, les connaisseurs of all lands will find enough to adapt to their own circumstances

Sensible and sure

 ASDA  Château de Gairoird Côtes de Provence Rosé ~£12–£14 Dry, fresh, strawberry‑and‑citrus, clean finish. A proper Provence rosé without the lifestyle‑inflation tax.

Polished mid‑range

Sainsburys M de Minuty Rosé ~£17–£20 Peach, watermelon, a touch of herbs, very Côte d’Azur. The one people bring to dinner parties when they want to look tasteful but not ostentatious.

Premium, but not insane

 Waitrose Whispering Angel (single bottle) ~£18–£25 Ultra‑pale, refined, citrus blossom, mineral finish. As often with Waitrose, you’ll be paying a bit more-but we think you’ll notice the difference.

That’s three fine choices  by which anyone can enjoy a taste of Provence without actually selling a kidney. À la vôtre !, or as they say in Old Provence :Santat!

#wine #provence #france #summer drinks #travel

Round up for this week: What’s the biggest living thing. how many quantums in an atom, lupus progress-and international relations

Fungal internet  Its not whales or trees:Some of the largest living things on our planet are actually vast networks of microscope white fungi growing beneath the ground on which  we unthinkingly tread as The Conversation explains;

Don’t expect Putin to go quietly if he loses in Ukraine    If you think current developments in the Russian Ukraine war might lead to a status quo ante bellum, think again ,as this prescient article from the Guardian makes clear

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/jun/14/vladimir-putin-ukraine-war-borders-russian-president

Plant a tree in ‘73, plant some more in ‘74 was a Government slogan from our long distant youth But maybe trees won’t save us from climate change as well as we thought they might  as this piece  from The Guardian explains

Trees may store less planet-heating carbon than hoped, study suggests | Greenhouse gas emissions | The Guardian

A bestiary of bosons Nothing so  defeats us as the vast and baffling variety of particles ,waves and other strange things that make up the modern atom .So we welcomed this article from Nature Briefing which tries to make sense of the matter

 How many elementary particles are there?

Even if you know your fermions from your bosons, the actual number of fundamental particles — the electrons, quarks and other building blocks of physics — is still uncertain. From the 17 that feature on posters on classroom walls, “where you stop depends on your taste for complexity and mystery”, explains science writer Natalie Wolchover. “Plausible answers range from 17 to — in all seriousness — 995.5.”

Quanta | 13 min read

Lupus in remission Just before we pressed the “SEND” button, our researchers insisted that this  encouraging story about a new immunological technique which seems to be turning the tide on the debilitating disease of Lupus went in, Good for them. here’s the BBC

‘I’ve never been this good’ – revolutionary immune reset puts lupus in remission – BBC News

Quote of the week

He that hasteth with his feet sinneth.” (Proverbs 19:2)

#lupus #immunology #fungi #Russia #physics #quantum physics #vladimir putin #trees

Roman Emperors and Iranian disasters: Julian revisited

In a little blog called The Emperor Julian’s Strategic disaster: are there any modern parallels? (LSS 25 3 26) we drew attention to the case of the Roman Emperor Julian . Whose great mistake was to enter into an unnecessary war of choice with Persia (then as now synonymous with Iran ) in order to boost his own flagging domestic popularity with what looked to be an easy victory.

Generally we try not to blow our own trumpet, as the vulgar phrase would have it. But we did at least draw a comparison which suggested that meddling with Iran/Persia , however disagreeable their regime, was a pretty bad idea unless you knew exactly what you were doing. We also noted that the end result of Julian’s blundering was a strategic backstep for his Empire of incalculable proportions by fatally weakening its offensive capabilities at a time when enemies assailed it on all frontiers. And we challenged readers to think of possible contemporary parallels to our little tale.

No historical parallel is ever perfect: no situation repeats exactly. But Julian was clearly out thought and out fought by an adversary who realised it had only to survive in order to emerge triumphant. So, once again-are there any modern parallels now that June has come?

#persia #iran #history #roman empire #united states #emperor julian

Should nicotine be included the war on drugs?

When that paragon of unimpeachable virtue Richard Milhous Nixon announced the War on Drugs back in 1971, we counted ourselves among his most fervid supporters. It chimed with our most basic principle: people must be stopped from enjoying themselves wherever and when that is possible. And when some of those people are pot-smoking hippies or degenerate cocaine fiends, how much more satisfying still was that act of repression! But yet, as always, the Devil Whispered in Our Ear: If we were banning all that weed and charlie and smack and billy whizz because they altered minds and caused social problems, then what about nicotine and alcohol?  Didn’t Jesus seem to take a relaxed view of the matter, both in the famous wedding at Cana (John 2 10 ), and in the Last Supper (Matthew 26:27–29) At least the company didn’t light up cigars at the end of the meal-but boy, did these passages pose us some problems!

Since when things have slipped still further. As if they didn’t have enough problems with fossil fuels and rising sea levels already, the nation of Palau has dropped another logic bomb upon the Comfortable nations of the world Read this Should Nicotine be regulated like drugs? from Nature Briefings

A call by the Pacific island nation of Palau for nicotine to be regulated like narcotics by the United Nations will trigger an assessment and a vote by member states. If nicotine were to be added to the UN Convention on Psychotropic Substances, it would effectively make it illegal to sell nicotine products that aren’t considered medicinal, says nicotine-treatment specialist Renee Bittoun. But tobacco-company lobbying makes it unlikely that nicotine will be added to the list, says Bittoun. Nature | 4 min read

Whatever next, gentle readers? Will they free up restrictions and red tape on the sale of tea and coffee? Will they start alleging the thrill people get from driving fast cars is like that from cocaine-and bring in speed restrictions? Or will some sect of uber – Free Market Liberals, followers of Adam Smith or something, seize power and then abolish all restrictions on all neurologically active substances? We can’t decide whether we are going to be oppressed by Communists or Capitalists: but we await our fate in trepidation.

[1] War on drugs – Wikipedia

#tobacco #nicotine #palau #pollution #free market #war on drugs #cannabis #cocaine #heroin #alcohol