CRISPR gallops ahead (article contains a warning for xenophobes)

Warning: this article may make uncomfortable reading for xenophobes everywhere)

Progress in CRISPR-Cas-9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)[1] and the associated enzyme is getting faster and faster. We started reporting on this truly innovative technique in 2020 and regular readers will recall updates ever since. Only four years ago it still felt a bit theoretical. But now radical applications are coming thick and fast Read this from Nature Briefing CRISPR horses spark debate reporting on the rather recondite world of polo pony breeding

the horses pictured above{*} are the first of their species to have been created with the help of the CRISPR–Cas9 gene-editing technique. They are clones of the prize-winning steed Polo Pureza, with a tweak to myostatin — a gene involved in regulating muscle development — that is designed to quicken their pace. Critics say that genetic manipulation has no place among polo’s traditional breeding practices — it has already been banned by some of the sport’s governing bodies. But a zoo of CRISPR-edited animals, from cows to sheep, is gaining acceptance in agriculture.Nature | 5 min read

^{{*} sorry LSS readers-we can’t show this}^-ed

In one sense there’s nothing new here. Humans have been modifying the genetics of plant and animal species since the dawn of the Neolithic. CRISPR and other base editing techniques have simply speeded the whole process up by making specific, designed changes and crucial nodes in the subject organism’s development. There is every reason to suppose that any number of new modifications to animals(and crop plants such as wheat) will be developed in the next few years. Some may even enable us the preserve the integrity of food supplies despite the ravages of things like plastics pollution and global warming. Also, as we have also reported here, gene editing is beginning to show real applications in medical fields such as sickle cell disease and certain cancer therapies. All of which leads us to an intriguing thought.

If ponies may be so easily modified, why not humans? One could start small by just modifying athletes and other small groups. Yet eventually the techniques could become ubiquitous in our species. Hang on-our species? Because the genetic differences between beings consisting entirely of CRISPR modified genes and the rest of us would then be far, far greater than those currently existing between our different races and ethnic groups. Are xenophobes everywhere already wasting their own time?

[1]https://www.yourgenome.org/theme/what-is-crispr-cas9/

#CRISPR Cas 9 #base pair #medicine #biotechnology #sickle cell #agriculture #stock breeding

Driving drives Dementia

Cars, don’t you love them? They cost a lot of money, they run people over, they allow cities to sprawl out over the countryside. Now comes evidence that the pollution that they cause, along with many other sources of pollution it has to be said, may be causing a special form of dementia called Lewy Body Dementia. [1] Ian Sample of the Guardian reports on a massive study of 56.5 million patients carried out by Dr Xiaobo Mao of Johns Hopkins University in the United States. The team found that fine particulate matter called PM_2.5 (LSS passim) caused proteins in the brain to form toxic clumps which slowly destroy nerve function leading to cognitive decline characterised by to memory loss, poor attention spans, visual hallucinations and sleep disturbance. The team went further and found the deadly particles induced similar symptoms in mice, confirming their evidence from population studies in humans .

When we did out background research for this article we were quickly overwhelmed by the amount of available evidence. This report [2] by the UK Government waxes lyrical on the different types of air pollutants-particulates, NO₂ SO₃, ammonia. and many more.. as well as the many symptoms the pollution causes in the human body. And this from the Alzheimers Society [3] puts the ball in the polluters’ court when it comes to neurodegenerative diseases particularly. We weren’t ever going to fit all that in paragraph two of a three paragraph blog, so we won’t try

What we will do instead is ask where does all this pollution comes from. Cars? Sort of. Factories? In a way. But the real source is a set of misguided economic policies which value growth numbers above all else. You have to have more growth than your neighbours or younare not reaklly worth anything at all. There must be more new cars, new washing machines new mobile phones, bright new shiny anythings, so that we can create a frantic cycle of production and consumption to prove how rich and clever and successful we are. But is the definition of the good life really to drive an overpriced automobile over concrete flyovers for a few years, followed by a long cognitive decline into dementia, really such a good life? Answers please-we’d love to hear them.

[1]https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/sep/04/fine-particulate-air-pollution-trigger-forms-dementia-study-lewy-body

[2]https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-matters-air-pollution/health-matters-air-pollution

[3]https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/about-dementia/managing-the-risk-of-dementia/reduce-your-risk-of-dementia/air-pollution

#automobiles #pollution #dementia #health # neurology

Two exciting new drugs for heart disease point a deeper lesson

News of two exciting new discoveries not only brings hope to cardiovascular sufferers around the the world. They also point the way to what has gone so terribly wrong and how despite everything, we could still get out of this mess.

First up is Baxdrostat, designed to reduce blood pressure. Sharon Wooler of the Daily Mail covers it here[1] As readers will instantly recall, it inhibits aldosterone synthase enzyme making it tough on hypertension and tough on the causes of hypertension. Yup, we guessed that was how it would work. Mmmm.

Next to the fore comes Clopidogrel, which is a doozy when it comes to preventing heart attacks and strokes: better than aspirin or so asseverates Andrew Gregory of the Guardian [2]Instantly we heard of the substance we asked” does it inhibit P2Y12 receptor on platelets?”-as any of you would have done, gentle readers, And the answer was: yes. It does!

The same Professor Bryan Williams and the same Conference of Cardiologists in Madrid cropped up in both stories, which we found confusing: but we have sorted it out for you gentle readers. All part of the service.

Oh yeah, what has gone wrong? Well, the fact is that both these drugs were developed using the scientific method. Which first needs long years of hard study to develop intellectual faculties like critical thinking, evidential assessment. probability theory and experimental design. Then many long hard hours in a laboratory learning to eliminate promising hypotheses and false lines of reasoning. This is a very different use of the word “research” to the activities of those who spend a few hours on the interweb, then jump to hasty conclusions which they spend the rest of their lives defending in an increasingly hostile aggressive and hysterical tone. it is this way of behaving which is slowly squeezing out scientific research. Cutting its funds and closing its laboratories. The longer it persists, the less new Baxdrostats and Clopidogrels there will be. And quite a lot more global warming.

[1]https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-15050895/Game-changing-miracle-drug-slash-high-blood-pressure.html

[2]https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/aug/31/doctors-find-drug-that-is-better-than-aspirin-at-preventing-heart-attacks-clopidogrel

#baxdrosat #clopidogrel #cardio vascular disease #heart #circulation #hypertensiion

How life evolved long ago is absolutely relevant today

Long suffering readers of this blog will recall our occasional sallies into the remote past. Like some latter day Doug McClure we occasionally take you into a world stuffed with dinosaurs, ape men and pterodactyls, to the detriment of more relevant stuff on antibiotics or the US Ten Year Bond. And so, although we were privately raving about this piece below called How did life get multicellular? from Nature Briefing, we thought we ‘d spare you from our private obsessions about things that took place between 800 -600 million years ago.

Until a chance encounter with one of more intelligent friends in the car park at our Spanish Conversation group produced the most inspiring thought. “All those Choanoflagellates. protometazoans. Filasterea. whatever, have to do several things if they are to succeed in living together. To glue up to each other. To signal little messages. To co-ordinate the cycles of cell division. Just like cancer cells have to, in fact. And then it hit us. These funny little organisms are the perfect way to model the behaviour of cancer cells. Not just the molecular and genetic mechanisms, but also the Information and Complexity models we must build to understand them: a cancer cell is a typical metazoan cell gone wrong.

Which confirmed a very old principle of this blog. All research however abstruse it may seem, will have a pay off somewhere one day. If it doesn’t benefit the economy, it will make us live longer; sometimes it may do both. These researchers are not just having fun on the edge of time: they may be contributing directly to the study of a disease which will kill half of us. There’s a thought for anyone who wants to cut university budgets or meddle with the findings of scientists.

To play out we shall first post the Nature Briefing paragraph. If you can get past that we’ve some supporting evidence for our basic proposition. We hope both will inform

Across all forms of life, the move from being single-celled to multicellular seems to have happened dozens of times — for animals, though, the jump was one-and-done. The unique cocktail of environmental and genetic factors that helped animal ancestors make that jump still eludes our understanding. To investigate, researchers are focussing on unicellular organisms that ‘dabble’ in multicellularity, occasionally forming colonies of many cells. By studying these organisms as they flit between the two states, scientists are hoping to illuminate how multicellularity stuck in animals — and what sparked the single successful event that gave rise to the animal kingdom.Nature | 11 min read

ASTRACT BECOMES APPLIED

This work discusses how cancer disrupts the gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that evolved to coordinate multicellular life. These networks balance genes inherited from unicellular ancestors (handling basics like metabolism and division) with newer multicellular genes (handling coordination, differentiation, and tissue integrity). https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-024-03247-1

and this how somatic mutations in early metazoan genes specifically disrupt the regulatory links between unicellular and multicellular gene networks. The result? Tumours behave like rogue unicellular entities, ignoring the cooperative rules of multicellularity. Some of these disrupted genes even correlate with drug response, hinting at therapeutic relevance

thanks to R Muggridge

https://elifesciences.org/articles/40947

#cancer #evolution #multicellularity #medicine #health #choanoflagellates

There will never be a sound-bite answer to what causes autism

Not our words, but those of Helen Tager-Flusberg a psychologist and expert on neurological conditions at Boston University inn the United States. Wise words indeed. Read this from Nature Briefing what we know about autism:

A claim by US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr that “an environmental toxin” is responsible for autism has worried many researchers and autism groups, who say it seems to ignore what’s already known about the condition. Decades of research suggests that genetics plays a huge part, although parental age, infections during pregnancy and a string of other environmental factors have also been linked to autism. “There will never be a sound-bite answer to what causes autism,” says psychologist Helen Tager-Flusberg. Meanwhile, the increasing prevalence of autism is predominantly caused by an increase in diagnoses rather than a true rise in underlying traits.Nature | 12 min read [1]

What we know. Humble words in a way. Especially in world where the deeply unhumble fill the internet and newspaper columns with shrieking headlines about what they think they know. Even set out on demonstrations carrying placards, as if emotion and wishful thinking could somehow override the basic facts of science and the laws of logical deduction. We live in an age where emotion now seems to be trumping clear thinking on every subject at every turn. But for the benefit of the few of you left who still believe in intelligence and logic we offer these questions, as they mark the limits of our own knowledge, and everyone else’s.

1 Is there a single condition called “autism”? Or does the word mask several different underlying conditions?

2 If there is a genetic cause, what is its heritability?

3 Are epigenetic factors also involved? If so how can they be measured?

4 Is there a single underlying causal factor?

5 What are the statistical probabilities that factors such as the age of the parents, prevalence of environmental toxins and types of diet play a role in producing diagnoses?

6 Did the change in diagnostic criteria in the 1990s change the prevalence in reported cases of the condition?

7 Why are their two different diagnostic systems anyway? (DSM and ICD) Ok, this is a personal peeve, but it could be affecting the data.

Autism is a neuralgic issue because it touches so many emotions: guilt, fear, anxiety, unknowing, shame and the overwhelming need for a cause to hate and blame. The attempts to grapple with it lie right on the edge of the limits of human skill and technique. Which means there can be no easy answers and no cure any time soon. COVID-19 it isn’t. But LSS prides itself on being a truth telling blog and the truth right now is that we just don’t know. Distrust anyone who dooes.

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02636-1?utm_source=Live+Audience&utm_campaign=a6bc173c35-nature-briefing-daily-20250827&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b27a691814-

#autism spectrum disorder #neurology #genetics #epigenetics #environment #diagnoses

Round Up: Trumponomics, Wind Farms, AIDS and Depeche Mode. Among other things

Donald Ducks out of the Free Market Any questions you might have about the leftward drift of Mr Trump’s economic policies are only confirmed as he starts trying to take control of interest rates and large companies like Lockheed Martin. We’ve two pieces here: the Guardian and NSBC which riff on both themes. Watch the video in the latter: it features economist Gillan Tett, as formidable an intellect as any currently offering their thoughts in the serious media at the moment .

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/aug/25/trump-federal-reserve-lisa-cook-explained

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85N6X5jvK9g

Contemplating, Celebrating New Life #1 Creating entirely new life forms was once a dream of the more outre writers of Science Fiction. Now it seems very real indeed as this piece from the Mail, which has enormous implications for many fields from Medicine to astrobiologyBreakthrough as scientists create a new form life | Daily Mail Online

New pill aids HIV sufferers Once again our researchers have put up a piece from the Mail . But bloggers can’t be choosers, so we ran with it. This is no cure: but it keeps the virus at bay and so help thousands lead healthier and more productive lives Monthly pill brings hope in fight against world’s deadliest STI

The Heat is on An unexpected side effect of global warming is that it may be making us age faster. There’s an irony here: as most of the deniers fall into the -erm- ahem- more senior- sections of the population this may only impede efforts to control this runaway catastrophe Heatwaves make a Biological Clock Run Fast from Nature Briefing

Repeated exposure to extreme heat events can accelerate the body’s ageing process. A long-term study of almost 25,000 people in Taiwan found that, for every extra 1.3 ℃ a person was exposed to, around 0.023–0.031 years was added to their biological clock on average — an extent comparable to that caused by regular smoking or alcohol consumption. The effect looks small, but cumulatively “can have meaningful public-health implications”, says environmental epidemiologist and study co-author Cui Guo. “Heatwave is not a personal risk factor, but a global concern,” she says. Nature | 4 min read
Reference: Nature Climate Change paper

Fearing the winds of change Peoples’ stated beliefs and opinions are often a guide to their deeper anxieties. A world view based on hyperconsumption and fossil fuels is now seriously archaic. This explains the deep angst ridden controversies that swirls around wind farms: they are huge visible reminder that we’ve been getting things seriously wrong for over one hundred years Here’s The Conversation

https://theconversation.com/why-wind-farms-attract-so-much-misinformation-and-conspiracy-theory-262192?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversati

Contemplating Celebrating New Life-#2 You knew we were going to chose this one, didn’t you? Yes- Depeche Mode it is

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?&q=depeche+mode+new+life&&mid=69CC976ED9B5100BA5C669CC976ED9B5100BA5C6&&FORM=VRDGA

#gillian #tett #economics #federal reserve #socialism #capitalism #biology #dna #HIV #AIDS #renewables #global warming #climate change

Gut Health/Mental health: the evidence is slowly accumulating

No it wasn’t us who thought of this first. It was a piece in that brilliant mag New Scientist which first gave us this jaw-dropping moment. There may be a link between the digestive system-what we eat, how we prepare it and what else lives in it-and mental health. Maybe, just may be the researchers in this frontier field may be on the edge of finding causal mechanisms for some mental disorders. Some at least. We have started to cover this topos (don’t you love that word?)in several blogs since 2022, with growing enthusiasm. In this spirit we present this latest from Nature Briefing A gut feeling about mental health

Preliminary evidence suggests that nurturing the gut microbiota could help to resolve depression and anxiety, whether through faecal transplant, probiotics or diet. Two 2016 studies showed that transferring faecal matter from someone with depression into rodents gave the animals depression-like behaviors. “This is not how we’d thought about mental illness, as something that can be transferred the way you could catch measles,” says psychiatrist Valerie Taylor. Now researchers are working to untangle how the microbiota influence various human illnesses throughout the gut-brain axis — including effects on the immune system, the vagus nerve and the enteric nervous system.Nature Outlook | 12 min read
This editorially independent article is part of Nature Outlook: The human microbiome, a supplement produced with financial support from Yakult.

But we stress several things. Firstly, it’s early days. All too often people get carried away by excitement, and lose their grip on evidence and reason. But LSS staff and readers are above the level of mental level of conspiracy theory enthusiasts! Correlation does not prove causation, we say gentle readers. That said, the earnest and thorough research around things like neural super highways, neurotransmitter production, microbiome and mood and faecal microbiota transplants has excited our curiosity to the utmost. Next time you see one of those poor devils on the street, their life wrecked by mental disorder, think this: is their hope that one day, at least, this may never happen again?

#mental health #gut #microbiome #digestive system #schizophrenia #blood brain barrier

AI-designed antibiotics: more good news to report

This is getting to be a habit. About a year ago we showcased a story about the redoubtable Professor de la Fuente and his team at the University of Pennsylvania who were starting to use AI for the development of new antibiotics. (LSS 6 6 2024). Since when our optimism has been justified seven fold over and seven, to coin a phrase. For today we are genuinely excited to bring you this story from James Gallagher of the BBC which takes things up to the next stage. [1]

Because another redoubtable Professor, one James Collins and his team at MIT have now used AI not only to identify potential new antibiotics, but also to synthesise them and prepare them for testing. What’s more, they’re going to try them out on MRSA and gonorrhoea, two recalcitrant old lags which have long frustrated researchers, as our long term readers will recall

The story ticks quite a few more LSS boxes with institutions like Imperial College and the Fleming Fund getting quotes. At last, things seem to be coming together. When we started our antibiotics obsession, ten long years ago, we foresaw the current civilisation collapsing under unstoppable plagues, just like the Roman one before us did. But if it does, it may not be for lack of new antibiotics: we feel we can say that much now. Plenty of lethal threats still confront us, from Global warming to the threat of nuclear war. And the recent collapse of the talks designed to limit plastic pollution is a shameful reminder of the cognitive limits of our species..[2] But: just occasionally, something can be done about something. Maybe that’s hope , for all we know.

[1]https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgr94xxye2lo

[2]https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgpddpldleo

#artificial intelligence #antibiotics #antibiotic resistance #MRSA #MIT

Bacteriophages v Bacteria: this arms race offers opportunities

We’ve always hymned the praises of bacteriophages here (LSS passim): that they will be a vital second option to supplement the next generation of antibiotic drugs. But we have a confession. We didn’t understand them. We didn’t appreciate that they are biological systems (viruses) interacting with other biological systems (bacteria). And as such, will obey all the usual rules of all such systems, such as arms races between predator and prey, Now a new article by Franklin Nobrega for the Conversation puts that right. [1]

Bacteria have evolved some fascinating defence mechanisms to ward off the relentless attacks of their phage enemies. These involve cutting the nuclear material of the viruses: building up strong cell walls and cellular shutdown mechanisms which act a bit like your IT Department does when it detects a global virus attack on your building’s systems. Recently Franklin and his team have investigated an early warning system called KIWA which gives the bacteria advanced notice that an attack is imminent. To which phages have in turn responded by their own mutations, and so it goes on, etc etc.

There’s a lot to encourage us here. Firstly, human knowledge of bacteriophages and their ways is deepening all the time, always a good thing. In fact Franklin is part of the University of Southampton phage collection project which we showcased here a few weeks ago (LSS 1 7 25) More strikingly, as two systems attack each other in an arms race, they leave little gaps, tiny vulnerabilities, which outsiders can exploit. The promise of new drugs and new bioengineering techniques looks very real indeed. Especially, we suggest if information scientists and complexity theorists are brought in to work alongside the biological teams. All in all, a rather good day for those of us interested in the problems of microbial antibiotic resistance. Go boldly, gentle readers, and be of good cheer.

[1]https://theconversation.com/how-ancient-viruses-could-help-fight-antibiotic-resistance-261970?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20

#microbial antibiotic resistance #bacteria #bacteriophage #health #medicine #phage collection project

If you want to know the truth about cancer, ask Liz O’Riordan

Because she’s seen it from both sides, is why. First she was a doctor, who like, worked in the field? And then because, she got it herself, right? Became a patient, and experienced all the heart stopping, roller coasting, will-I -won’t-I? chain of emotions that all her own patients did. If those aren’t qualifications enough, gentle readers, we don’t know what are. And-she has one other which seals the deal as far as we’re concerned. Read on, and you will learn what that is.

We came across Dr O’Riordan in the course of listening to a series called Marianna in Conspiracyland on BBC Radio 4 [1] Not having an especially large legal department we must be careful what we say. But the programme details the activities of the types of people who disparage reason-based science and evidence-based medicine. And instead offer a dubious range of alternative theories, explanations and prescriptions to people who are scared out of their wits by a cancer diagnosis. In the nicest possible way, the programme tried to explain the consequences of choosing these paths of treatment, And Dr O’Riordan was one of the speakers they called in their support. A little bit like the prosecution in a criminal case calling an expert witness in DNA or drugs, as t’were.

Because since her own diagnosis and treatment, Dr O’Riordan has spent her days ceaselessly writing, speaking, making media appearances, all to one end. Refuting fallacies, identifying illogicalities, reasoning with the unreasonable. In books like The Cancer Roadmap [2] she tries to explain the science behind why cancers develop and grow, what the best treatments are, and why so-called “alternative systems” don’t seem to be up to much. In this undertaking she joins a great tradition of rationalists and sceptics starting with Lucian of Samosata,[3] and stretching all the way through to people like Peter Medawar, Carl Sagan and Dr Ben Goldacre.

But she goes one step further. Because she never condemns or sneers at anyone. Instead she tries to ask why people turn from rational medicine to alternatives and faith. In other words she deploys human qualities of empathy and compassion. And we could all learn from that. For years on this blog we have bemoaned the growth of fake information, conspiracies and general rubbish which grows on the interweb like the digital equivalent of a cancer. Not just in cancer theory; in matters like global warming, politics and economics. Hasn’t done much good. Somehow, the easy, comforting answer outpaces the complicated rational one each time, and by ratios of thousands. We are in danger of becoming the last generation of enlightened, rational thinkers, perhaps for thousands of years. Time to listen to Liz and her methods. Soon.

[1]https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001mssm

[2]https://liz.oriordan.co.uk/author/

[3]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucian

[4]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Goldacre

#cancer #medicine #alternative medicine #rational #empirical #science #health