Heroes of Learning: Steven Rose (and why things are never simple)

No book ever tore through the calm assurances of progress through co-operation like Richard Dawkins’ The Selfish Gene. [1] It wasn’t so much the book itself. That was an attempt to popularise, albeit sometimes in colourful language, the discoveries of an important group of evolutionary theorists such as William Hamilton and EO Wilson. It was the use made of it by political activists, zealous propagandists of the Free Market, to prove that every attempt at co operation, collective action and sharing resources was against the basic laws of nature. “Out upon your Trades Unions, your Keynesian economics” they thundered in a thousand articles in places like the Daily Mail “we are nothing but animals. Your only purpose is to pass on your DNA to make copies of yourself. Look at them lions. mate! When one of them takes over a pride he kills all the cubs and mates wiv the females to make sure his genes get frough! Go and do like wise!” It was not an experiment we felt disposed to try. Compete, for the other fellow is your genetic enemy was their credo. All barriers to that competition were both evil and deluded.

It was simple, it was seductive, it was based on some facts. It played well in the broken restless zeitgeist of the 1970s when the pillars of the old prosperity- high taxes, demand management for the common good, collective institutions like the IMF and UN seemed ineffective. It sold by the million; and swept ever more voters into the booths for one Margaret Thatcher in 1979, whose own simplistic and reductionist nostrums seemed to chime so well with those of the book.

One man did not buy. His name was Steven Rose, a remarkably accomplished scientist who spent most of his work in neurobiology and biochemistry [2] This obituary summarises his work better than us. But it was his insistence on complexity and the irreducible flexibility of the human mind, that still allowed hope for a way out from the genetic prison in to which we had been so neatly incarcerated

He wrote: “It is in the nature of living systems to be radically indeterminate, to continually construct their – our – own futures, albeit in circumstances not of our own choosing.”

Look at that carefully, then leap with us to another part of the scientific forest. Where the BBC showcases a new technique to rid the world of the scourge of inherited mitochondrial disorders [3] Basically you take a fertilised ovum from a normal male-female coupling, but put it as the nucleus in the egg of a different female. Which then develops as a normal embryo until nine months later a healthy baby emerges[3] A three parent child? Sort of. Two parents get to pass on their DNA, no doubt to the blissful delight of Dawkins’ more extreme followers. And a different mother sends her mitochondrial DNA cascading down the ages, which rather complicates matters for some. Now look at the Rose quote again what was that about continually constructing?

At the time of the great Dawkins controversy the old BBC Horizon programme ran a show in which the quoted one of the wiser and more humane scholars in the Selfish Gene camp. His name was John Maynard Smith. And he ended with this thought “humans are not just animals- we are not prisoners of simple genetics” At the time it seemed a forlorn hope. It has just been proved triumphantly real.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Selfish_Gene

[2]https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/jul/10/steven-rose-obituary

[3]https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn8179z199vo

#richard dawkins #sociobiology #biochemistry #medicine #DNA #mitochondria

This is what awesome intelligence looks like

No we’re not writing about ourselves as some hardened readers may have already guessed. Because we couldn’t achieve what the researchers in these two stories, both from Nature Briefing, have indeed achieved. Sorry guv- we don’t have their intellectual bandwidth . Cognitive intricacy. Brains, in good old fashioned English But we know intelligence when we see it, and we know you do too.

Algorithms design remarkable enzymes Researchers have used computer algorithms to design highly efficient synthetic enzymes from scratch, reducing the number of tedious hands-on experiments needed to perfect them. The products facilitate a chemical reaction that no known natural protein can, with an efficiency similar to that typically achieved by naturally occurring enzymes. One design was also 100 times more efficient than similar enzymes previously crafted using artificial intelligence. In comparison to enzymes that occur in nature, the algorithm’s creations are less complex and can’t grapple with multi-step chemical reactions, but they’re proof that the approach has promise.Nature | 4 min read
Reference: Nature paper

The medical potential of designer enzymes will not be lost on readers as intelligent as our own. Yet some discoveries are to be relished not for their use, but for what they tell us about the world and our real place in it Try this for size

Dragon Man was a Denisovan Ancient proteins and mitochondrial DNA extracted from the ‘Dragon Man’ fossil — a cranium found in northeastern China that is at least 146,000 years old — have confirmed that it belonged to a Denisovan, an archaic human group. The fossil is the first skull to be definitively linked to the group, which sheds light on what the ancient people looked like, putting an end to decade-long speculation.Nature | 5 min read
Reference: Cell paper & Science paper

Learning. Reason. Curiosity. Handy, aren’t they? Their absence can lead to different outcomes indeed. As the inhabitants of certain regions of the globe know only too well.

#protein #mRNA #medicine #health #evolution

Human Genome Editing: A Frankenstein Future?

Technology always advances faster than ethics. Leaving society and individuals floundering in it wake. The printing press transformed European society in the sixteenth century. The cotton gin transformed the economy of the US South, arguably deepening Slavery, and instituting a pattern of violence and cultural wars which have lasted to this day. In the last century, the development of nuclear fission and computing have effected changes as profound as any known in History. It is with these examples in mind that we approach the subject of Human Genome Editing, which may make everything before look silly.

This has been a decade in which the effective manipulation of nucleic acids in living systems has become routine. We have covered such exciting techniques as CRISPR Cas-9 and Base Pair Editing. While all educated people stand in awe of the rapid advance of mRNA vaccine technology, which did so much to stem the COVID-19 pandemic and now offers real hope of new cancer treatments. But, without disparaging the intellectual brilliance or immense hard work of their creators, these technologies are relatively small scale in the size of the biological interventions which they entail. So now read this from Nature Briefings:

Brace for the arrival of Gene editing Modifying multiple DNA variants in human embryos at the same time, a process called polygenic genome editing, could substantially reduce the likelihood of certain diseases occurring. But it also raises concerns, say the authors of a Nature analysis — not least the renewed threat of eugenics. “This is not a hypothetical issue,” argues an accompanying Nature editorial. While such genome editing might be decades off, societies need to consider its possible benefits and risks now to avoid having to play regulatory catch-up when the technology becomes available.Nature | 4 min read
Reference: Nature paper

Imagine a society where the very richest may edit the DNA of themselves and their offspring so that they, and they alone form a race of superbeings. The future for the rest of human kind, the untermenschen if you will, looks grim, and may be very brief. Such evolutionary bottlenecks have occurred in the past; and those on the wrong side(always the majority) “fly forgotten as a dream, flies at the end of day” as the old hymn puts it. Time to consider this very seriously indeed we think. Nature thinks you may have 30 years: we suspect it to be much shorter than that.

#gene editing #dna #biology #biochemistry #CRISPR #Base pair editing #genetics

Apologies for big mistake in that last blog!

Oh God, oh God, why do we keep doing this? In last week’s blog Plastic Pollution, killed by neo liberalism and how we can’t keep up, we forgot to include anything that covered that last bit! Tiredness, information overkill, whatever the reason we apologise utterly un-reservedly. This is what we were going to say:

There has been yet another discovery in Biochemistry. A noble and intriguing discovery no doubt. But one which has left us reeling, longing for the simplicity of earlier times. Before we start, read this: The study of RNA’s strangest form, from the admirable Nature Briefings

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) — molecules in which an unusual version of the standard RNA-splicing process folds the strand back on itself — are implicated in diseases from cancer to Alzheimer’s, but exactly what they do is still a mystery. This is in part because circRNAs are so rare, and distinguishing their impact from that of their linear cousins isn’t easy. Fortunately, researchers are quickly assembling a toolbox of materials and methods to recognize, quantify and uncover the functions of these puzzling loops. The database circAtlas is helping to clarify the landscape by requiring listed circRNAs to be identified by two tools, and biotech company Arraystar is designing microarrays to hunt for circRNA in human samples.Nature | 11 min read.

Admirable indeed. But we couldn’t help an odd nostalgia for an age when RNA came in two forms. When there were only three TV channels(in the UK) There was only beer to drink. Do you sometimes, just sometimes, feel the same?

There, Happy Now?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNA

#rna #biochemistry #information #nostalgia

Reason or Unreason: which will give you a better life?

What happens when you apply reason to solve your problems? And what happens when you give way to emotions, like fear or anger? Two stories from Nature Briefings illustrate the consequences rather nicely, we think.

Reason: New developments in RNA therapies Older readers, who remember as far back as the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020, may recall how a little thing called an RNA vaccine began to make a big difference. Since when a lot of time has passed, and RNA medical technology has come on leaps and bounds. Don’t take our word for it, read this, RNA treatments nearing reality

As early as the mid-1990s, scientists suggested editing molecules of RNA as a treatment for certain diseases, but at the time, they lacked the tools to do so. Around thirty years later, those tools are at our disposal. Editing RNA instead of DNA has several advantages. It’s a process that cells perform naturally, it doesn’t risk permanently altering a person’s genes and it doesn’t introduce bacterial enzymes to human cells as CRISPR-Cas9 gene therapies do. The field of RNA editing may be in its infancy, but pharma companies are already testing its use in some types of eye disease and cancer.Science | 13 min read

For the record, it’s worth clicking on the link, because the article is very clear, with some truly awesome graphics

Unreason: Let’s chuck foreigners out of our Universities Now try this:

A surge in far-right parties entering governments across Europe is raising concerns for science. Policy experts warn that these parties typically show no interest in research and innovation, leaving scientists vulnerable to budget cuts. In the Netherlands, researchers are bracing for €1 billion (US$1.1 billion) in cuts to the university and research budget under a coalition government including the anti-Islam Party for Freedom. The coalition also wants to limit the intake of international students and implement rules that would require universities to apply for permission to teach courses in English, which could trigger an exodus of foreign academics who don’t want to, or can’t, teach in Dutch.Nature | 5 min read

Chuck out foreigners! Don’t let those evil English speakers corrupt the purity of our language! The really odd thing about this for us is the parallel with football . The most successful Universities are like the most successful clubs(compare the Imperial College with Manchester City, if you like) The trick is to create centres of excellence, drawing in the very best talent you can find, and taking a relaxed view of things like native language, dress sense and marital customs. There is often a strong overlap between certain types of football fan and support for right wing parties. Do they really want their favourite team to send home all the foreign players?

#football #university #learning #reason #unreason

Nature Briefings upsets the apple cart. Big Time

What if everything you learned forty and fifty years ago was wrong? Where would you be then. Something a bit like that happened to us this week when we read this piece from Nature Briefings, Bizarre bacteria scramble workflow of life

Bacteria have stunned biologists by reversing the usual flow of information. Typically genes written in DNA serve as the template for making RNA molecules, which are then translated into proteins. Some viruses are known to have an enzyme that reverses this flow by scribing RNA into DNA. Now scientists have found bacteria with a similar enzyme that can even make completely new genes — by reading RNA as a template. These genes create protective proteins when a bacterium is infected by a virus. “It should change the way we look at the genome,” says biochemist and study co-author Samuel Sternberg.Nature | 4 min read
Reference: bioRxiv preprint (not peer reviewed)
For more coverage of the most abundant living entities on our planet — microorganisms — and the role they play in health, the environment and food systems, update your preferences to sign up to our free weekly Nature Briefing: Microbiology

When we were young, there was a central doctrine in biology. Information was stored in genes, deep in the cell nucleus. These were made of DNA. This information was turned into RNA, then used to make proteins. The DNA code was unchangeable, inviolate which made the operations of natural selection all the easier to facilitate. If a large cat suddenly developed DNA to give it stripes, then it could hide better in the jungle, and pass on more copies of the DNA. Hence tigers evolved. Job done. To think the DNA could be modified by some environmental feedback was not only Lamarckian heresy, there was no obvious mechanism by which it could come about.

Now we are Not saying that the above discoveries overthrow the central tenet. Not yet. But remember how the Michelson Morley experiment in the 1880s posed a deep, unanswerable question at the heart of physics which was not fully resolved until Einstein came along a generation or so later. And we are certainly not going to make impulsive conclusions . But our story today, combined with all the recent advances in Epigenetics, do suggest however that the old model is now awaiting a major rethink.

[1]michelson morley experiment##biology #cell biology #dna #rna #darwin #lamarck #bacteria #protein #gene

More hidden numbers – Or a glimpse of the Mind of God?

A couple of years ago, we published a little blog in which we dared to suggest that the recurrence of certain numbers, such as pi and Euler‘s might hint at deeper universal phenomena that are not yet fully understood.(LSS 14 3 22) So we were more than gratified to come across an intriguing article by Steven Pappas for Live Science which further confirms our suspicions.

A team led by Vaibhev Mohanty at MIT has been trying to answer a simple but profound question. “How many mutations do you need in a genome before it changes the phenotype( i.e. proteins, etc) of the carrying organism? Now, we will confess at this point that our grasp of mathematics is appalling. However:

Scientists have discovered that a key function from a “pure” branch of mathematics can predict how often genetic mutations lead to changes in function. These rules, laid out by the so-called sum-of-digits function, also govern some aspects of protein folding, computer coding and certain magnetic states in physics.

The report explains, in verbal form, some more about how the team arrived at these conclusions. But for us the key is that the same mathematics applies across several fields of science, as though something much deeper is going on. Well, that’s what we speculate. But we were not the first. As educated readers will recall, Plato speculated that the universe was formed of deep underlying structures, which he termed “forms”. And in his view a single Divine mind had created the universe through these same forms. So we pose this question: have these scientists, and others, had a tiny glimpse of the Mind of God?

[1]https://www.msn.com/en-gb/health/mindandbody/scientists-uncover-hidden-math-that-governs-genetic-mutations/ar-AA1f95OM?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=HCTS&cvid=7d80

[2] https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41754/chapter-abstract/354205224?redirectedFrom=fulltext

#genes #proteins #mathematics #plato #theology #mutation