How good teaching won a Nobel Prize

For our next look at this year’s Nobels, we thought we’d showcase the three brilliant researchers who share the prize for Chemistry. For those who need to come up to speed here’s Nature Briefing’s story, Chemistry Nobel for Supersponge MOFs

Chemists Susumu Kitagawa, Richard Robson and Omar Yaghi have won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for developing the world’s most porous solid materials, known as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Structured like molecular scaffolding, MOFs contain vast caverns of internal space; Nobel committee chair Heiner Linke likens them to “Hermione’s handbag in Harry Potter — it can store huge amounts of gas in a tiny volume”. In the 30 years since they were first developed, they have become part of efforts to capture carbon from the air and remove ‘forever chemicals’ from water, among many other applications.Nature | 4 min read

Now, we in no way would distract from the accomplishments of Drs Kitaga or Yaghi. But what we want to do here is tell a very human story of how the third laureate, Dr Robson, got involved in the first place.

One day he was constructing large wooden models of crystal structures for undergraduate chemistry lectures at the University of Melbourne. These models—representing structures like sodium chloride and fluorite—were made from coloured wooden balls (atoms) connected by rods (bonds), carefully drilled at precise angles using trigonometric calculations. We’ve all seen them, they are stand by of every A level and undergraduate teaching room

As Robson assembled these models, he noticed something profound: the components seemed “invested with information,” naturally predisposed to form the intended structure. This observation led him to wonder: what if molecules could behave similarly—self-assembling into predictable, extended structures using chemical bonds instead of rods? That question planted the seed for MOFs, which he began exploring seriously about a decade later.

It’s funny how learning is a holistic thing. Research informs teaching. And teaching informs research. Oddly enough artists like Leonard Bernstein and Stephen Sondheim found the same thing, if you substitute “creative writing” for research. Perhaps its the idea of responding to questions, looking at the bigger picture. Or in Robson’s case, taking time out to play creatively with models. If you have found the same, oh readers, let us know. Meanwhile tell your Government to keep funding research and universities. As we saw in the last blog- they’ll get their money back.

#chemistry #nobel prizes 2025 #metal organic frameworks #carbon capture #climate change #science #research

Element 120? We stand in awe

One of the earliest memories of the school science lab was to see the Periodic Table for the first time. You know, that forbidding-looking chart of squares and funny, recondite little symbols like Mn and Cs, all arranged in a curious array of lines and columns. A long way from the everyday world of glam rock, flared trousers and playground rivalries about football teams and Ben Sherman shirts.

Those who looked slightly beyond the immediate would know that change was coming. NASA kept landing on the moon. And some very clever people were trying hard to push this same periodic table beyond its natural limit of 92 and make artificial elements with far more protons than could be found in nature. Fast forward fifty five years or so, and we suddenly realise how far they have got. Read this from Nature Briefings: Heaviest Element Yet within reach

Researchers have demonstrated a new way to make superheavy elements, opening the door to creating the heaviest element ever and adding another row to the periodic table. Scientists used a beam of titanium to make a known superheavy element, livermorium — element 116. If they’re able to make elements 119 and 120, as planned after an equipment upgrade, they will be the first documented from the eighth ‘period’. In this row, scientists expect to find atoms with so-far unseen electron configurations.Nature | 7 min read
Reference: arXiv preprint

It really is worth clicking on the link, gentle readers. If only to see a group of people performing at the best levels which our species can. Co-operating. Multinational. Thinking differently. Counter-intuitive-hell, what is a”titanium beam” anyway? That’s how progress comes. Just thinking again, in the old tired ways, the channels laid down as a child, will get us nowhere. Except, perhaps, backwards. The periodic table really can go beyond 92. Petrol really is bad for your health. Old allegiances will threaten your survival, if you’re not careful. Time to think as these scientists have done,

#nuclear physics #periodic table #research #chemistry