• 

• 

• 

Readers of LSS, being the educated, far seeing type, will agree that whatever the ups and downs of Trumps, Kardashians and the Premier League, the issue of climate change is the paramount one if our times. How far have we got-and what about the backsliders?

Writing for Bloomberg, Akshat Rathi is an optimist.* He sees climate change action as becoming “institutionalised”. Despite the growing disasters like floods and fires, he sees much to be proud of. His List of Good Guys is big and growing- Japan, China South Korea the EU and the UK, whose recent divorce agreement mentioned climate change 51 times. Even the USA gets a favourable mention, thanks to the election of Joe Biden. It’s a nice, readable audit of how far we’ve come.

It may no longer be polite to be an out-and-out denier at the best dinner tables, but according to Michael E Mann, author of The New Climate War, the other side have simple shifted tactics-much as the tobacco lobby did when it was clear that the game was up on scientific grounds. They now go in for soft denialism, and the range of tactics is accomplished. A favourite target is renewable energies like wind and solar, which become a target of scare stories in right wing outlets, or lobbying against subsidies for their development. There’s far more than the space in a tiny blog allows-see for yourself.

We rarely take a personal note. But one of the more astonishing moments of our life was when we were assured by a Brazilian Student that “climate scientists are only in it for the money” When we compared the pitiful salaries of researchers against the massive financial resources of the carbon industries, we knew where the money lay. And how much he still had to learn. Progress has been made, but we have a long, long way to go.

Climate Action Is Embedding Into How the World Works – Bloomberg

THE NEW CLIMATE WAR | Kirkus Reviews

Book Reference The New Climate War Michael E Mann Public Affairs 2021

#climatechange #globalwarming #renewable energy #fossilfuel #softdenialism

• 

• 

It’s all too easy to say “yes, we care about animal welfare-but people will always want their cheap food, so you’ll never get very far”. Our jumping-off point today is a passionate and deeply moral article by British MP Andrea Jenkyns for the Independent. She is excoriating about the dreadful conditions that factory chickens are kept in, and the pandemics of avian flu that sweep through the industry (nine in 2020 alone!)

It’s the word pandemic that presses the alarm button for us at LSS. Because it could spread to us too. Most of the pandemic diseases that plague us started with the domestication of animals in the Neolithic. Including tuberculosis, measles, rhinoviruses, smallpox and of course the influenza group, the orthomyxoviridae. The key genus to worry about is alpha, with its well known H_xN_x classification, whose various strains can cause bird flu or human flu, among others. What is more, the pesky things can jump the barriers between humans, birds and pigs, incubate and mutate in any one, then jump out again to kill. Especially when the hosts are living in crowded filthy conditions-which is Andrea’s great fear. Web MD has a nice link which goes into this: but what you should know is that bird flu is high on the list as the next possible pandemic agent.

And so, with Andrea Jenkyns, we ask you, our readers this question: is money the only way to measure the price of food?

^{We thank Mr Gary Herbert of Buckinghamshire for this story}

There’s no place for ‘Frankenchicken’ in post-Brexit Britain – here’s how we end their sale in supermarkets | The Independent

What is avian or bird flu? (webmd.com)

#influenza #pandemic #avianflu #factoryfarming #chicken

• 

• 

• 

It is August 15 1977. England and Australia are locked in the fourth Test Match at Headingley. If you got tired of cricket you could turn your dial to the Hit Parade Charts, which were topped by the Brotherhood of Man’s Angelo. But with the benefit of hindsight, the one to listen for was the astronomically-themed Magic Fly by Space, then at Number 27. For this was the day that the famous, enigmatic Wow signal arrived at the Big Ear telescope in Ohio. It has remained utterly inexplicable ever since.

Now it has been joined by a second candidate, detected by the Parkes Radio Telescope on Australia. It was another narrow band signal dubbed BLC-1, picked up in the spring of 2019. It seems to have come from our nearest neighbour. Proxima Centauri, which is known to have at least one rocky planet. Or did it?

The problem with both candidate signals is that they are one- off data points, quite unrelated to each other. Either could be little green men, earth interference, or something we don’t know about at all. The trouble with observing with just one radio dish is that you can’t be absolutely certain it was Proxima Centauri-there are hundreds of potential stars in the observation field. Good scientists can do little with single data points-they are as useless as single fact soundbites in politics.

As it’s quite important to know if anybody is out there, it’s time we tightened up on our techniques. Writing in The Conversation, Michael Garrett thinks they way to eliminate all these pesky ambiguities is by using many dishes across the globe at the same time. The technique is called Very Long Baseline Interferometry. The obstacles are formidable; it’s very new, and the amount of data to process is colossal. But we do at last have the computers to do it. If you really are interested in the science of aliens, and not flying saucer fantasies, this could at last be the way ahead. I know there’s a bit of science here, but don’t be put off; Michael writes very clearly. We give you a Wikipedia link on the Wow signal, in case you need refreshing.

SETI: new signal excites alien hunters – here’s how we could find out if it’s real (theconversation.com)

Wow! signal – Wikipedia

#seti #extraterrestrialintelligence #biglisteningproject #blc1 #wowsignal #aliens

• 

• 

• 

Confession: we at LSS could never really get on with Moby Dick, Herman Melville‘s nineteenth century classic. Yes, we know you’re not supposed to judge books by the standards of a later age. But for us the one sided, money driven slaughter was insupportable. An old soldier, who had fought real men with real guns, once told us that he didn’t like hunting because it wasn’t very brave at all to go up against animals when you have guns and they don’t.

The slaughter of intelligent whales and dolphins seemed especially barbaric, given their well-known intelligence and importance to the ecology. If these people really wanted to be ignorant and aggressive, why didn’t they just get tanked up on cheap beer, apply to demolish Chartres Cathedral, and replace it with a superstore? Anyway, by the nineteen seventies it really looked as if all cetaceans, including the Blue Whale (Balaenoptera musculus) were on the way out forever.

However, due to the tireless and often brave efforts of conservationists and other educated people, it really does seem that there is now a chance. Lauren McWhinnie, in The Conservation has a really heart warming piece about the return of all kinds of whales to their ancestral feeding grounds in the Antarctic. There’s a couple of good pictures and lots of facts for you to jump off from, as Lauren’s piece is part of their Oceans 21 series for this year. An old friend and sometime contributor to these pages recently took a holiday in the southern oceans, and told us how marvellous it was to see these living treasures returning again to their ancient waters. A victory of sorts for learning and intelligence over aggression and greed. We need a lot more.

The hopeful return of polar whales (theconversation.com)

#antarctica #southernoceans #conservation #whales #dolphins #whaling #oceans21

• 

• 

• 

The debts being run up to cover the costs of Covid-19 lockdowns are now so eye-watering that they are truly comparable to those run up in wars. To take one example; by October 2020, UK national debt had already reached 100.8% of GDP- a chilling ratio last seen in the years after the Second World War. Many other countries have similar problems.

There are two possible approaches to debt. You could pay it back. This was the approach of the Cameron-Osborne government from 2010-2016, and even with the best will in the world, the results were mixed for UK PLC. The other is to wait until the economy grows, letting the proportion of debt fall until it is manageable. This was the strategy pursued by both Labour and Conservative Governments in the UK from 1945 until 1979, and on the whole, it worked.

So how can you persuade an economy to grow? And especially fast? More and more findings seem to indicate that the answer is to spend on R&D. This leads to innovation (especially in marketable products) which in turn leads to growth, funding more R & D, which in turn…….etc etc. We’ve got a couple of links below where you can explore at leisure. We liked John Wu in Innovation Files,* who puts it succinctly

^{The more a country sets aside today for R&D, the greater the dividends they stand to reap in the future. In that sense, among OECD nations, Korea leads in R&D intensity at 4 percent, followed by Japan at 3.4 percent, and then the United States trailing in third at 2.8 percent. For comparison, the R&D intensity of all OECD nations averages at 2.4 percent. Countries such as Korea and China have focused on expanding heavy investment into R&D over the past decade}

The fact he wrote this in 2015 only makes his predictions for the rise of China all the more prescient!

A little extra spend on R&D is worth a lot more in a few years. As the world emerges from the Covid-19 crisis there are limitless opportunities for new technologies and new markets. We are not financial advisers and can make no prediction. But to us as laymen, the speculation around healthcare and renewable energies looks intriguing. And anyone who could master cleaning up the results of 200 years of industrial pollution would indeed be wealthy. The world of the 2030s might be clean, healthy and prosperous indeed.

Fueling Innovation: The Role of R&D in Economic Growth | The Innovation Files

How important is R&D for economic growth? – Research & Development World (rdworldonline.com)

R&Dspending #GDP #nationaldebt #science #covid-19 #renewableenergy #greenindustries

• 

• 

• 

To all readers and followers, too numerous to name. Sorry about the inexplicable technical problems which caused the last one to be published twice!

• 

• 

• 

“I am a sovereign individual, entire of myself; thus free to do whatever I want ,whenever ; any attempt to constrain me is an intolerable assault on liberty.” Noble sentiments; but also the creed of every polluter, and their supporters in media and government, who wish to dump the consequences of their lucrative operations into someone else’s life. And death.

Historically the worse pollution happens with the sudden appearance of new, rapidly changing industries. For the simple reason that old established legislation was quite inadequate to meet the threats. The new cities of the industrial revolution were famous for smoke, disease and contaminated water. It took decades and centuries of bitterly contested legislation to bring even minimal standards of health and safety. But no one would deny that it was worth it. An even better example was food purity legislation. Early mass produced foods were full of questionable ingredients including strychnine and lead (which helped with flavour and appearance) or just bulkers like water and chalk. It took the efforts of reformers like Arthur Hill Hassall (1817-1894) *and many others, in many countries, to effect reforms.

The massive explosion in information technology has allowed anyone and everyone to dump whatever they want into the common pool of human knowledge. All cry the same “I am free to say want-my opinion is as good as yours!” The damage effected has been clear for all to see.

The need for legislation to control the quality of what is put into the public domain is now overwhelming. Oddly enough, examples of good practice exist, which might give us a clue as to how standards might evolve. Let’s take the Scientific Journal Nature as an example. Anyone is free to send anything to it. They may expound on an almost infinite number of topics from Archaeology to Zoology. However, the Editor sets certain limits before he will publish. These include standards on proof, evidence, verifiability and logic. Intolerable affronts to many, no doubt. But they have made Nature a byword for trustworthiness-and therefor a product of high value. Try a subscription if you don’t believe us. And these standards can be found across many journals.

Parliamentary legislation need not stand in the way of free speech or liberty. But a common space needs common rules of behaviour. The internet is no different.

Arthur Hill Hassall – Wikipedia

#informationpurityact #cleanairacts #pollution #internet

• 

• 

• 

“I am a sovereign individual, entire of myself; thus free to do whatever I want ,whenever ; any attempt to constrain me is an intolerable assault on liberty.” Noble sentiments; but also the creed of every polluter, and their supporters in media and government, who wish to dump the consequences of their lucrative operations into someone else’s life. And death.

Historically the worse pollution happens with the sudden appearance of new, rapidly changing industries. For the simple reason that old established legislation was quite inadequate to meet the threats. The new cities of the industrial revolution were famous for smoke, disease and contaminated water. It took decades and centuries of bitterly contested legislation to bring even minimal standards of health and safety. But no one would deny that it was worth it. An even better example was food purity legislation. Early mass produced foods were full of questionable ingredients including strychnine and lead (which helped with flavour and appearance) or just bulkers like water and chalk. It took the efforts of reformers like Arthur Hill Hassall (1817-1894) *and many others, in many countries, to effect reforms.

The massive explosion in information technology has allowed anyone and everyone to dump whatever they want into the common pool of human knowledge. All cry the same “I am free to say want-my opinion is as good as yours!” The damage effected has been clear for all to see.

The need for legislation to control the quality of what is put into the public domain is now overwhelming. Oddly enough, examples of good practice exist, which might give us a clue as to how standards might evolve. Let’s take the Scientific Journal Nature as an example. Anyone is free to send anything to it. They may expound on an almost infinite number of topics from Archaeology to Zoology. However, the Editor sets certain limits before he will publish. These include standards on proof, evidence, verifiability and logic. Intolerable affronts to many, no doubt. But they have made Nature a byword for trustworthiness-and therefor a product of high value. Try a subscription if you don’t believe us. And these standards can be found across many journals.

Parliamentary legislation need not stand in the way of free speech or liberty. But a common space needs common rules of behaviour. The internet is no different.

Arthur Hill Hassall – Wikipedia

#informationpurityact #cleanairacts #pollution #internet

• 

• 

• 

Well, New Years Eve has always been a traditional time for fun and japes and conga lines-and lots and lots of champagne. Sadly, old Mr Covid-19 is going to crimp that this year, and by more than a little! But, do not despair, god reader. We at LSS have a couple of delicious champagne cocktail recipes for you to try as the big countdown to the glorious hour begins.

French ’75

Supposedly named after a powerful piece of Gallic field artillery, this is a fun sharpener with quite a slug of our favourite spirit-gin. The lemon and caster will give it the feel of a sparkling version of that old LSS favourite Between the Sheets. So, adapted from from Hamlyn‘s The Ultimate Cocktail Book:

Half fill a tall glass with cracked ice. Add 1 measure of good dry gin, the juice of half a fresh lemon, one teaspoon of caster sugar, and chilled champagne. These days Bollinger or Veuve Clicquot are perfectly acceptable, unless you live in somewhere like Monaco. You can decorate this one well with orange, lemon or lime slices to give that real party feel.

The Bellini

Most readers of LSS will be more than familiar with Renaissance Art, and the works of Giovani Bellini in particular. We know this from our focus groups. So it may come as no surprise that this one was named after the eponymous author of such works as St Jerome in the Desert, Christ Blessing and St Francis in Ecstasy. We are a bit unsure about that last one; surely a small tipple before evensong would have been sufficient? Anyway, once St Francis had come back down he, and you, could well have enjoyed the following. Again it is from our immortal Hamlyn, which is to us what Das Kapital is to the followers of Karl Marx.

Take a large, robust wineglass. Add two measures of fresh peach juice. Add four measures of chilled champagne and a dash of grenadine. Hamlyn recommends peach slices to decorate. We say: use your imagination, it’s New Year’s Eve!

You can read the full histories and more about these cocktails below via Wikipedia. But don’t forget, Knowledge and objective learning are now in deep, deep danger. Wikipedia is one of the best guardians of truth that we have. And so we earnestly beg you to think how much you can donate to this marvellous resource. They too must survive another year: details below in the links.

French 75 (cocktail) – Wikipedia

Bellini (cocktail) – Wikipedia

Support Wikipedia – Wikimedia Foundation

The Ultimate Cocktail Book Hamlyn 2004

#french75 #bellini #champagne #newyearseve #cocktails #wikimediafoundation

Regular readers of LSS have sometimes criticised us for taking a sunny, over-optimistic view on the possibilities of human progress. We have been accused of thinking like a nineteen sixties schoolboy, dazzled by new technologies like antibiotics, spaceflight and James Bond gadgets. Naively asserting that progress in one field will automatically lead to progress elsewhere. Blind to the fact that the mass of humankind are doltish ignoramuses, driven by greed and loathing. (And sex, as we shall see below). Today we offer two stories which offer evidence both against us and for us.

Superresistant gonorrhea: The case against LSS

Some years ago, some clever scientists developed a nice little antibiotic called azithromycin. It can be used in all sorts of cases, including respiratory illnesses, but was especially useful against the well known STI gonorrhea. During the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, clinicians threw everything they could at patients with Covid-19, including azithromycin; it seemed to have some use with associated respiratory conditions. The trouble with mass prescription of antibiotics is that mass resistance soon develops. Meanwhile millions of people continued having sex (what happened to the lockdown restrictions?-ed) and now cases of super-resistant gonorrhea are shooting up. The whole sorry saga is admirably told by Natalie Rahhal in the Mail.

Super gonorrhea could be fueled by antibiotic use amid the pandemic | Daily Mail Online

RNA supervaccines-the case for LSS

The original discovery of the importance and structure of nucleic acids has unleashed a torrent of discovery and change in fields as diverse as genetic engineering and Forensic Science. Today Nuno Dominguez of El Pais details exciting new techniques developed by a team at the University of Pennsylvania in RNA vaccines. They have developed a tiny nanocapsule which will deliver their virus directly to the target tissue. Small modifications in RNA could allow a whole class of vaccines to counter 30 diseases including AIDS and flu -and may even let you synthesise your own monoclonal antibodies. It’s amazing stuff, but English speakers will need their translator.

Los pioneros del ARN ya investigan vacunas contra 30 infecciones diferentes | Ciencia | EL PAÍS (elpais.com)

So how long before the work of the second group is abused and wasted like azithromycin was? Why do we, as a species, shoot ourselves in the foot, as it were, time and time again? Are we truly doltish and ignorant, as asseverated above? Perhaps there is another answer, captured by Franklin D Roosevelt, that greatest of American Presidents, who on his inauguration in 1933 stated:

the only thing we have to fear is fear itself, the nameless unreasoning terror which paralyses needed efforts to convert retreat into advance…”

#covid-19 #antibiotics #azithromycin #gonorrhea #rnavaccines #monoclonalantibodies